California Securities Fraud Attorney Call Today 800-699-1881
California Securities Fraud Lawyer Firm Overview Attorney Profiles Recoveries Obtained Frequently Asked Questions Testimonials Contact Us
information center
Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
Securities
Broker Misrepresentation
Brokerage Firms Sued
FINRA
Structured Products
Hedge Fund Losses
Recognizing Investment Losses
Recovery of Investment Loss
Securities Arbitration
Reverse Convertible
Misconduct
Securities Fraud
Securities Mediation
Securities Litigation
Stock/ Investment Losses
Suitability/ Unsuitability
Unauthorized Trading
Common Claims
Products
Frequently Asked Questions
Attorney Referrals
Video Center
securities fraud blog
legal blog Click here for a free case evaluation. Read our Articles on Securities Related Issues here. have a question resources
contact us
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Are you a new client?
Message:
10 Avvo avvo badge
If you need help recovering your losses contact us today. View our complete list of brokerage firms and banks we've sued.

California Appeals Court Demonstrates Strong Presumption for Arbitration in Reversal

The California Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court's ruling in which the lower court ruled that a jilted investor did not have to arbitrate with a former associated person of a defunct FINRA member firm.

The claims were made by the Ronay Family Limited Partnership, who made a series of failed investments with the now-defunct FINRA firm CapWest Securities, Inc., based upon recommendations by the investment advisory firm Tweed Financial Services, Inc.

Before opening the account, Ronay and Tweed signed an account agreement with a clause that stated disputes or controversies arising out of CapWest transactions shall be settled by arbitration pursuant to FINRA rules ("the arbitration clause").

When Tweed made a motion to compel arbitration, Ronay opposed the motion on the grounds that because CapWest was defunct and therefore no longer a FINRA member firm, the arbitration clause was no longer enforceable.

The lower court agreed with Ronay, denying the petition on the grounds that the member firm CapWest was defunct.

The Court of Appeal's reversal found the lower court erred by denying the motion to compel arbitration. Because Tweed was an investment advisory firm—a third party—it could not be considered a FINRA member and therefore, the status of CapWest as a defunct firm has no bearing on the arbitration rights of third party, Tweed.

The decision is significant in that it holds an investment advisory firm and registered representative retain the rights to compel arbitration—or enforce the arbitration clause—under FINRA rules, even when the securities brokerage firm becomes defunct and loses its ability to enforce the clause.

If you have invested through or with the services of an investment advisory firm whose recommendations have proven harmful to your investments or interests, please call The Law Offices of Jonathan W. Evans & Associates at (800) 699-1881 for an investigation and consultation.

News: Former AP of Defunct Firm May Enforce FINRA Arbitration Pact (Mondaq)

Categories: Arbitration, FINRA
accolades
The Law Offices of Jonathan W. Evans & Associates - California Securities Fraud Attorney
Located at 12711 Ventura Boulevard, Suite #440 Studio City, CA 91604. View Map
Phone: (800) 699-1881 | Local Phone: (818) 760-9880.
Website: